es-
02-21-2007, 05:58 AM
I'm just one error away from validating my site's xhtml, and I have no idea how to fix it.
The message:
Error Line 84 column 12: end tag for "ul" which is not finished.
The code in question:
<tr id="navfooter"><td bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<ul class="navfooter"><li><a href="http://www.confutatis.org">© Elaine</a></li>
<li><a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdesign.confutatis.org%2F">XHTML 1.0</a></li>
<li><a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdesign.confutatis.org">CSS</a></li>
<li><a href="http://wordpress.org/">Wordpress</a></li>
<li><a href="#">TOP</a></li></ul></td></tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
My site: http://design.confutatis.org
I've double and triple checked the </ul> tag to see if it's incorrectly nested, but it looks fine. The strange thing is that the top navigation bar on my site - which also uses the same code - validates fine.
Another odd thing is that my site validates when I refresh the validation page at random. Is this a true validation error, or just something on the w3c page that screws things up?
The message:
Error Line 84 column 12: end tag for "ul" which is not finished.
The code in question:
<tr id="navfooter"><td bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<ul class="navfooter"><li><a href="http://www.confutatis.org">© Elaine</a></li>
<li><a href="http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdesign.confutatis.org%2F">XHTML 1.0</a></li>
<li><a href="http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/validator?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fdesign.confutatis.org">CSS</a></li>
<li><a href="http://wordpress.org/">Wordpress</a></li>
<li><a href="#">TOP</a></li></ul></td></tr>
</table>
</body>
</html>
My site: http://design.confutatis.org
I've double and triple checked the </ul> tag to see if it's incorrectly nested, but it looks fine. The strange thing is that the top navigation bar on my site - which also uses the same code - validates fine.
Another odd thing is that my site validates when I refresh the validation page at random. Is this a true validation error, or just something on the w3c page that screws things up?